Reply to thread

Message

[USER=60104]@Sebastiii[/USER] core.dll v2 tested. I doublecheck again all the versions.
The v2 version works just like v1. I have not found differences. I don't know if this is the expected. Note that I only test the textboxscrollup control (well, and label and fadelabel only for comparison)

All the defines in references.xml are working as expected (in <label> and <textcolor>)

All the 'only defines' (like <define>#test_textstring_xml:This is text in define</define>, that is <define property="false"...>...</define>) are working as expected inserted in myvideo.views.default.xml, that is included from myvideos.xml. Here's something interesting/baffling: If I put this define (<define>#test_textstring_xml:This is text in define</define>) in the main file (myvideos.xml) just after this one (<define>#backdrop:background\videos.jpg</define>) (used as text in <label>, no like file path). Well, the first one (#test_textstring_xml) don't work in textboxscrollup <label>, but the second one (#backdrop) works. I can't see any (functional) difference between the two. Let's keep going, this is only a curiosity.

All the properties (<define property="true"...>...</define>) are working if they are inside myvideo.views.default.xml, Some of them are also working inside myvideos.xml: the properties that are only text, and are rendered in the first check. The properties that have other property inside, dont work, so in this case the second check is not doing its job, as expected. (or so it seems to me).

However, this fix works properly and fixes some issues present in version 1.12 without causing regressions (at least in my tests with textboxscrollup, label and fadelabel).

Do you want that I try the instaler for 1.13 test version? Can I upgrade to 1.14 Final when available from this test version?

Thanks.

<blockquote data-quote="XMaM" data-source="post: 1171792" data-attributes="member: 134551">[USER=60104]@Sebastiii[/USER] core.dll v2 tested. I doublecheck again all the versions.The v2 version works just like v1. I have not found differences. I don't know if this is the expected. Note that I only test the textboxscrollup control (well, and label and fadelabel only for comparison)All the defines in references.xml are working as expected (in &lt;label&gt; and &lt;textcolor&gt;)All the 'only defines' (like &lt;define&gt;#test_textstring_xml:This is text in define&lt;/define&gt;, that is &lt;define property=&quot;false&quot;...&gt;...&lt;/define&gt;) are working as expected inserted in myvideo.views.default.xml, that is included from myvideos.xml. Here's something interesting/baffling: If I put this define (&lt;define&gt;#test_textstring_xml:This is text in define&lt;/define&gt;) in the main file (myvideos.xml) just after this one (&lt;define&gt;#backdrop:background\videos.jpg&lt;/define&gt;) (used as text in &lt;label&gt;, no like file path). Well, the first one (#test_textstring_xml) don't work in textboxscrollup &lt;label&gt;, but the second one (#backdrop) works. I can't see any (functional) difference between the two. Let's keep going, this is only a curiosity.All the properties (&lt;define property=&quot;true&quot;...&gt;...&lt;/define&gt;) are working if they are inside myvideo.views.default.xml, Some of them are also working inside myvideos.xml: the properties that are only text, and are rendered in the first check. The properties that have other property inside, dont work, so in this case the second check is not doing its job, as expected. (or so it seems to me).However, this fix works properly and fixes some issues present in version 1.12 without causing regressions (at least in my tests with textboxscrollup, label and fadelabel). <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite24" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs Up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Do you want that I try the instaler for 1.13 test version? Can I upgrade to 1.14 Final when available from this test version?Thanks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="XMaM, post: 1171792, member: 134551"] [USER=60104]@Sebastiii[/USER] core.dll v2 tested. I doublecheck again all the versions. The v2 version works just like v1. I have not found differences. I don't know if this is the expected. Note that I only test the textboxscrollup control (well, and label and fadelabel only for comparison) All the defines in [B]references.xml[/B] are working as expected (in[I] <label>[/I] and [I]<textcolor>[/I]) All the 'only defines' (like [I]<define>#test_textstring_xml:This is text in define</define>[/I], that is[I] <define property="false"...>...</define>[/I]) are working as expected inserted in [B]myvideo.views.default.xml[/B], that is included from[B] myvideos.xml[/B]. Here's something interesting/baffling: If I put this define ([I]<define>#test_textstring_xml:This is text in define</define>[/I]) in the main file ([B]myvideos.xml[/B]) just after this one ([I]<define>#backdrop:background\videos.jpg</define>[/I]) (used as text in [I]<label>[/I], no like file path). Well, the first one ([I]#test_textstring_xml[/I]) don't work in textboxscrollup [I]<label>[/I], but the second one ([I]#backdrop[/I]) works. I can't see any (functional) difference between the two. Let's keep going, this is only a curiosity. All the properties ([I]<define property="true"...>...</define>[/I]) are working if they are inside [B]myvideo.views.default.xml[/B], Some of them are also working inside [B]myvideos.xml[/B]: the properties that are only text, and are rendered in the first check. The properties that have other property inside, dont work, so in this case the second check is not doing its job, as expected. (or so it seems to me). However, this fix works properly and fixes some issues present in version 1.12 without causing regressions (at least in my tests with textboxscrollup, label and fadelabel). (y):) Do you want that I try the instaler for 1.13 test version? Can I upgrade to 1.14 Final when available from this test version? Thanks. [/QUOTE]