Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="joboehl" data-source="post: 153947" data-attributes="member: 23490">Sorry dman. What I ment is that if Sony and others are choosing different video processor chips, it seems to me that there are alternatives that provide at least a good if not better image processing than what ATI and nVidia has to offer. Faroudja was just an example. Good to hear that. Would be interesting to understand how it would work with the graphic card in order to provide the HDCP protection. I just think that today, encode and reencode streams are way too CPU demanding, generate a lot of noise and taking a lot of time. Some examples of solutions that could benefit from it are:- Encode videos for other devices (iPod, Palm/Pocket and etc). - Reencode streams to record on DVD (for MyBurner for example). - Reencode streams for remove viewing, so TVServer could for example replace a slingbox trough realtime reencoding a stream to lower resolution/bitrate.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="joboehl, post: 153947, member: 23490"] Sorry dman. What I ment is that if Sony and others are choosing different video processor chips, it seems to me that there are alternatives that provide at least a good if not better image processing than what ATI and nVidia has to offer. Faroudja was just an example. Good to hear that. Would be interesting to understand how it would work with the graphic card in order to provide the HDCP protection. I just think that today, encode and reencode streams are way too CPU demanding, generate a lot of noise and taking a lot of time. Some examples of solutions that could benefit from it are: - Encode videos for other devices (iPod, Palm/Pocket and etc). - Reencode streams to record on DVD (for MyBurner for example). - Reencode streams for remove viewing, so TVServer could for example replace a slingbox trough realtime reencoding a stream to lower resolution/bitrate. [/QUOTE]

Verification