Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lehmden" data-source="post: 1077791" data-attributes="member: 109222">Hi.MB3 server is nice, no doubt. But it has its limitations. The biggest of all, it's really slow and eats enormous amount of CPU. And it did not have LiveTV feature integrated. If you like to run MB3server and want it fast responding you need a powerful CPU. For a machine which is often running 24/7 this is not a good thing. On a typical MediaPortal server with low power consuming CPU like Atom or other mobile CPU the MB3 server nearly is unusable... I have a MB3 server &quot;running&quot; on a Celeron 847 system that has not even a tiny issue running MP1 TV Server, MySQL Server, MP2 Server, MP2 Client, MPExtended,... But the MB3 server is way to much for it. An Import of 500 Videos lasts more than 5 hours...The MP2 Server is performing a hundred times better (and recently we're working to improve performance even more). It still don't have as much features as MB3 server but this only is a matter of time....</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lehmden, post: 1077791, member: 109222"] Hi. MB3 server is nice, no doubt. But it has its limitations. The biggest of all, it's really slow and eats enormous amount of CPU. And it did not have LiveTV feature integrated. If you like to run MB3server and want it fast responding you need a powerful CPU. For a machine which is often running 24/7 this is not a good thing. On a typical MediaPortal server with low power consuming CPU like Atom or other mobile CPU the MB3 server nearly is unusable... I have a MB3 server "running" on a Celeron 847 system that has not even a tiny issue running MP1 TV Server, MySQL Server, MP2 Server, MP2 Client, MPExtended,... But the MB3 server is way to much for it. An Import of 500 Videos lasts more than 5 hours... The MP2 Server is performing a hundred times better (and recently we're working to improve performance even more). It still don't have as much features as MB3 server but this only is a matter of time.... [/QUOTE]

Verification