home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
Video codec always reverts to Microsoft DTV
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="hoborg" data-source="post: 565528" data-attributes="member: 77164"><p>Shark codec pack and SAF working similar in many ways, both use the same decoders.</p><p></p><p>Bigest diference between SAF and Shark codec pack is that SAF is primary aimed for HTPC and setup as much as possible fully automatically. After SAF install, there is no need to configure anything.</p><p>Next difference is that SAF only install really necessary decoders, Shark codec pack install for example 6 h.264 decoders and ask user wich one should be used.</p><p></p><p>I do not known if Shark codec pack is capable to "unlock" Win7 registry, SAF can do it and it will auto setup prefered decoders. </p><p></p><p>I didnt try to say that Shark codec pack is bad, only to describe diference between each one <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="hoborg, post: 565528, member: 77164"] Shark codec pack and SAF working similar in many ways, both use the same decoders. Bigest diference between SAF and Shark codec pack is that SAF is primary aimed for HTPC and setup as much as possible fully automatically. After SAF install, there is no need to configure anything. Next difference is that SAF only install really necessary decoders, Shark codec pack install for example 6 h.264 decoders and ask user wich one should be used. I do not known if Shark codec pack is capable to "unlock" Win7 registry, SAF can do it and it will auto setup prefered decoders. I didnt try to say that Shark codec pack is bad, only to describe diference between each one :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
Video codec always reverts to Microsoft DTV
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom