home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Vista vs. XP - please post your pros/cons
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pilehave" data-source="post: 372855" data-attributes="member: 71550"><p>XP = Footprint < 500 MB and RAM-usage < 90 MB on fresh install. You can run XP on a 2 GB CF-card, even with some extra room for the page-file. Try that with Vista <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>IMHO the advantages in Vista are on the desktop-level - running a HTPC should just be done on the system with less bloat. Picture quality has never been an issue for me, I see no tearing in VMR 9 and to me the colorspace seems to be handled ok i VMR 9, at least I cannot see any difference when comparing output from my HTPC (XP) to my laptop (Vista).</p><p></p><p>The DXVA 2.0 support should theoretically take load off the CPU, but when I can play a BluRay-movie with an average of 15% CPU I don't know what to do with this "advantage". Perhaps when we get something like Quad-FullHD <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite6" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":cool:" /></p><p></p><p>One advantage is that you can get more than two channels out of an HDMI-connection - on XP you are restricted to DD or DTS. I use a dedicated soundcard so...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pilehave, post: 372855, member: 71550"] XP = Footprint < 500 MB and RAM-usage < 90 MB on fresh install. You can run XP on a 2 GB CF-card, even with some extra room for the page-file. Try that with Vista ;) IMHO the advantages in Vista are on the desktop-level - running a HTPC should just be done on the system with less bloat. Picture quality has never been an issue for me, I see no tearing in VMR 9 and to me the colorspace seems to be handled ok i VMR 9, at least I cannot see any difference when comparing output from my HTPC (XP) to my laptop (Vista). The DXVA 2.0 support should theoretically take load off the CPU, but when I can play a BluRay-movie with an average of 15% CPU I don't know what to do with this "advantage". Perhaps when we get something like Quad-FullHD :cool: One advantage is that you can get more than two channels out of an HDMI-connection - on XP you are restricted to DD or DTS. I use a dedicated soundcard so... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Vista vs. XP - please post your pros/cons
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom