home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
VLC ActiveX
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jlewalle" data-source="post: 64535" data-attributes="member: 22504"><p>Forgive me for not being entirely familar with the architecture just yet. So right now video is provided as raw frames from some source, and the only activex used is to play audio? Is that the general idea right now? What would be nice, is if we could take the time to see what changes are necessary to the VLC ActiveX so that we can get raw frame data. And then, because I believe in options, I like something like this:</p><p></p><p>IFrameSource </p><p> - CurrentVideoFrameSource (I dunno what's being used now, but the current implementation can live here)</p><p> - VlcFrameSource</p><p> - VisualizationFrameSource</p><p> - WebCamFrameSource</p><p> - PictureSlideShowFrameSource (not sure if this one makes sense, because it's probably better to think of the picture slideshows on a higher level than raw frames)</p><p> - VncFrameSource (hehe)</p><p> etc...</p><p></p><p>IFrameRenderer</p><p> - WindowedFrameRenderer</p><p> - FullScreenFrameRenderer</p><p> - TwirlingInCrazyCirclesRenderer</p><p></p><p>I would be crazy excited about something like this. Of course, I imagine the hard part is the Vlc/Mplayer frame sources. How much work was integrating mplayer in the XBMC project? I'm usually against massive changes to 3rd party projects for integrating them, but perhaps there's a middleground we can find. Thoguhts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jlewalle, post: 64535, member: 22504"] Forgive me for not being entirely familar with the architecture just yet. So right now video is provided as raw frames from some source, and the only activex used is to play audio? Is that the general idea right now? What would be nice, is if we could take the time to see what changes are necessary to the VLC ActiveX so that we can get raw frame data. And then, because I believe in options, I like something like this: IFrameSource - CurrentVideoFrameSource (I dunno what's being used now, but the current implementation can live here) - VlcFrameSource - VisualizationFrameSource - WebCamFrameSource - PictureSlideShowFrameSource (not sure if this one makes sense, because it's probably better to think of the picture slideshows on a higher level than raw frames) - VncFrameSource (hehe) etc... IFrameRenderer - WindowedFrameRenderer - FullScreenFrameRenderer - TwirlingInCrazyCirclesRenderer I would be crazy excited about something like this. Of course, I imagine the hard part is the Vlc/Mplayer frame sources. How much work was integrating mplayer in the XBMC project? I'm usually against massive changes to 3rd party projects for integrating them, but perhaps there's a middleground we can find. Thoguhts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
VLC ActiveX
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom