Reply to thread

Message

Next:
Assume that the return values are greater than 32768, ie from 0 .. 65535, then LevelToDB(peakL, 65535) return values from -infinity,-96 .. 0. And LevelToDB(peakL, 32768) return values from -infinity,-90 .. 6.
[USER=10391]@hwahrmann[/USER] Can it be worth introducing a corrective value to get the right readings? Ie +6

But LevelToDb return Int16, ie -32768 .. 32768 ... Min 0 for dB* and max 32768 for dB, after LevelToDb we get: -96 ..-6

<blockquote data-quote="ajs" data-source="post: 1224984" data-attributes="member: 68833">Next:Assume that the return values are greater than 32768, ie from 0 .. 65535, then LevelToDB(peakL, 65535)&nbsp; return values from -infinity,-96 .. 0. And LevelToDB(peakL, 32768) return values from -infinity,-90 .. 6.[USER=10391]@hwahrmann[/USER]&nbsp; Can it be worth introducing a corrective value to get the right readings? Ie +6But LevelToDb return Int16, ie -32768 .. 32768 ... Min 0 for dB* and max 32768 for dB, after LevelToDb we get: -96 ..-6 <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite3" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :(" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":(" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ajs, post: 1224984, member: 68833"] Next: Assume that the return values are greater than [B]32768[/B], ie from 0 .. 65535, then [B]LevelToDB[/B](peakL, 65535) return values from [B]-infinity,-96 .. 0[/B]. And [B]LevelToDB[/B](peakL, 32768) return values from [B]-infinity,-90 .. 6[/B]. [USER=10391]@hwahrmann[/USER] Can it be worth introducing a corrective value to get the right readings? Ie +6 [B]But LevelToDb return Int16, ie -[B]32768 .. [B]32768 ... Min 0 for dB* and max [B][B][B]32768 for dB, after [B]LevelToDb we get: -96 ..-6 :([/B][/B][/B][/B][/B][/B][/B] [/QUOTE]