Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Oxan" data-source="post: 776352" data-attributes="member: 97484">I'll take a look, that should indeed be corrected.I think that's actually a problem with WCF. These methods just return an int instead of a complex structure. I'll discuss it.We should do better parameter verification indeed.I'm feeling bad now about this, but we're going to break the API again in the next release (which will be the last time we break it for a long time). Our plans for the next release are to make the API more generic, so that we can easily add support for other database (for example MyFilms). As part of this we've to break backwards compatibility though. I'll integrate your remarks in the new API. For now you can probably go ahead implementing, as I think it'll take some time before we have release and it'll probably end up only being changed in details (like parameter names as you suggested). I'll create a list of changes when we've finished implementing it. Btw, for all developers using the service, we are aware of the fact that documentation is currently totally lacking. The best source to start is probably the source code at this moment. If you want live support, you can join #mp-extended on irc.freenode.net (IRC) where I (and other team members too) around to answer your questions. If you prefer WLM you can send me a PM. (Of course we'll answer on the forums too).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Oxan, post: 776352, member: 97484"] I'll take a look, that should indeed be corrected. I think that's actually a problem with WCF. These methods just return an int instead of a complex structure. I'll discuss it. We should do better parameter verification indeed. I'm feeling bad now about this, but we're going to break the API again in the next release (which will be the last time we break it for a long time). Our plans for the next release are to make the API more generic, so that we can easily add support for other database (for example MyFilms). As part of this we've to break backwards compatibility though. I'll integrate your remarks in the new API. For now you can probably go ahead implementing, as I think it'll take some time before we have release and it'll probably end up only being changed in details (like parameter names as you suggested). I'll create a list of changes when we've finished implementing it. Btw, for all developers using the service, we are aware of the fact that documentation is currently totally lacking. The best source to start is probably the source code at this moment. If you want live support, you can join #mp-extended on irc.freenode.net (IRC) where I (and other team members too) around to answer your questions. If you prefer WLM you can send me a PM. (Of course we'll answer on the forums too). [/QUOTE]

Verification