Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Broceliande" data-source="post: 59806" data-attributes="member: 20120">Anyway, each new svn build is expected to be better than the previous... How could that be different <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.In some case , new features or fixes may introduce new issues.So when such a case occurs, better is to rollback to previous releases...waiting for a new fixed release.As said before, they are released as it.MP testers may have tested them for a special issue.. or not... You're free to choose using them or not. Using them and reporting issues help MP developpers to fix them.Only candidate releases (RC) are fully tested and supposed to be stable. That doesn't mean you won't find a svn with a better stability and more features.Hope this will help you in your choices.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Broceliande, post: 59806, member: 20120"] Anyway, each new svn build is expected to be better than the previous... How could that be different ;). In some case , new features or fixes may introduce new issues. So when such a case occurs, better is to rollback to previous releases...waiting for a new fixed release. As said before, they are released as it. MP testers may have tested them for a special issue.. or not... You're free to choose using them or not. Using them and reporting issues help MP developpers to fix them. Only candidate releases (RC) are fully tested and supposed to be stable. That doesn't mean you won't find a svn with a better stability and more features. Hope this will help you in your choices. [/QUOTE]

Verification