Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1110496" data-attributes="member: 82144">Thanks for the feedback guys. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />[USER=48495]@morpheus_xx[/USER]FYI, the channel search in my branch makes it possible to specify both encryption and provider as a search criteria.Some examples might help...A simple example first: you could search for all channels with only non-encrypted tuning detail(s)...encryption == &quot;free&quot;Or maybe you want to include any channel that has at least one non-encrypted tuning detail...encryption != &quot;encrypted&quot;Alternative:encryption == &quot;free&quot; | encryption == &quot;mixed&quot;To find all free channels from a specific provider:encryption == &quot;free&quot; &amp; provider == &quot;MyFreeProviderName&quot;Or maybe two specific providers?encryption == &quot;free&quot; &amp; [provider == &quot;MyFreeProvider1&quot; | provider == &quot;MyFreeProvider2&quot;]Or maybe you want to match only a part of the provider name?encryption == &quot;free&quot; &amp; provider : &quot;abc&quot;From these examples I hope you can see a glimpse of the potential. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />Search is much more powerful than the group options... but perhaps too complex or inconvenient, at least for some people (not me!!! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> ). So, I started this thread to try to understand how many people are using the options, as well as some of the use cases...Would you change your vote after knowing this? <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite7" alt=":p" title="Stick Out Tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":p" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1110496, member: 82144"] Thanks for the feedback guys. :) [USER=48495]@morpheus_xx[/USER] FYI, the channel search in my branch makes it possible to specify both encryption and provider as a search criteria. Some examples might help... A simple example first: you could search for all channels with only non-encrypted tuning detail(s)... [B]encryption == "free"[/B] Or maybe you want to include any channel that has at least one non-encrypted tuning detail... [B]encryption != "encrypted"[/B] Alternative: [B]encryption == "free" | encryption == "mixed" [/B] To find all free channels from a specific provider: [B]encryption == "free" & provider == "MyFreeProviderName" [/B] Or maybe two specific providers? [B]encryption == "free" & [provider == "MyFreeProvider1" | provider == "MyFreeProvider2"] [/B] Or maybe you want to match only a part of the provider name? [B]encryption == "free" & provider : "abc" [/B] From these examples I hope you can see a glimpse of the potential. ;) Search is much more powerful than the group options... but perhaps too complex or inconvenient, at least for some people (not me!!! ;) ). So, I started this thread to try to understand how many people are using the options, as well as some of the use cases... Would you change your vote after knowing this? :P [/QUOTE]

Verification