home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Codecs, External Players
Why Core AVC?
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Inker" data-source="post: 324294" data-attributes="member: 10541"><p>Hmm, ffdshow does not use your videocard to decode h264.</p><p></p><p>CoreAVC is, just like ffdshow, a software based decoder, which means you're cpu does all the work. CoreAVC is, however, much more efficient than ffdshow, so it doesn't stutter on high bitrates quite as easily, this all depends on youre hardware though. If ffdshow runs fine then the only thing you will gain by using coreavc is lower cpu usage, which could mean lower heat/lower noise. But this is heavily dependend on your system.</p><p></p><p>The H264 standard dictates the exact decoding result, so both should output the exact (bitwise exact) same output, so there is zero quality difference. If there is, it is a bug. ffdshow of course offers some post-processing that coreavc does not, but you can still chain ffdshow as a raw decoder after coreavc and get the best of both worlds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Inker, post: 324294, member: 10541"] Hmm, ffdshow does not use your videocard to decode h264. CoreAVC is, just like ffdshow, a software based decoder, which means you're cpu does all the work. CoreAVC is, however, much more efficient than ffdshow, so it doesn't stutter on high bitrates quite as easily, this all depends on youre hardware though. If ffdshow runs fine then the only thing you will gain by using coreavc is lower cpu usage, which could mean lower heat/lower noise. But this is heavily dependend on your system. The H264 standard dictates the exact decoding result, so both should output the exact (bitwise exact) same output, so there is zero quality difference. If there is, it is a bug. ffdshow of course offers some post-processing that coreavc does not, but you can still chain ffdshow as a raw decoder after coreavc and get the best of both worlds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Codecs, External Players
Why Core AVC?
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom