home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 2
Skins and Design
BlueVision
Windows 10 Theme for BlueVision skin
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ge2301" data-source="post: 1195521" data-attributes="member: 145639"><p>[USER=48291]@Brownard[/USER] </p><p>While overworking the skins, I became again aware of the conflict between the "kenburn" effect and smooth transition effect of the background image.</p><p>The first background image shown is still moving by "kenburns" effect and afterwards all background images are static. Perhaps there is a way to allow a coexistance of both effects <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ge2301, post: 1195521, member: 145639"] [USER=48291]@Brownard[/USER] While overworking the skins, I became again aware of the conflict between the "kenburn" effect and smooth transition effect of the background image. The first background image shown is still moving by "kenburns" effect and afterwards all background images are static. Perhaps there is a way to allow a coexistance of both effects :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 2
Skins and Design
BlueVision
Windows 10 Theme for BlueVision skin
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
