home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Popular Plugins
Moving Pictures
Windows 7 Taskbar
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RoChess" data-source="post: 563706" data-attributes="member: 18896"><p>Wierd, I've been using DXVA since the nVidia 8000 series introduced it (nVidia called it "PureVideo HD" back then, before Microsoft coded in support in DirectX), and have switched to AMD HD4000 when I put low power at a higher priority. But anyway, I guess you prefer to use a very expensive CPU to do the software decoding, as a minimum of 3Ghz dual-core is needed to barely decode high bitrate H.264, then a $20 GPU that can do it much faster.</p><p></p><p>So just do a software comparison yourself then. As I said before, the MPC-HC application can be used to test, doesn't require any installation and it relies on the internal filters first, assuming u don't adjust settings, so it will not use CoreAVC/etc. Then just compare that to CoreAVC via the CPU results gathered from the performance monitor in Task Manager, and you will know what works best for you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RoChess, post: 563706, member: 18896"] Wierd, I've been using DXVA since the nVidia 8000 series introduced it (nVidia called it "PureVideo HD" back then, before Microsoft coded in support in DirectX), and have switched to AMD HD4000 when I put low power at a higher priority. But anyway, I guess you prefer to use a very expensive CPU to do the software decoding, as a minimum of 3Ghz dual-core is needed to barely decode high bitrate H.264, then a $20 GPU that can do it much faster. So just do a software comparison yourself then. As I said before, the MPC-HC application can be used to test, doesn't require any installation and it relies on the internal filters first, assuming u don't adjust settings, so it will not use CoreAVC/etc. Then just compare that to CoreAVC via the CPU results gathered from the performance monitor in Task Manager, and you will know what works best for you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Popular Plugins
Moving Pictures
Windows 7 Taskbar
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom