home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
XBMC comparison
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rusten" data-source="post: 58021" data-attributes="member: 10303"><p>Right, certainly an "extender" is one such feature worth consideration; however, this is a sensitive word in the context of DVR's because MS has coined it as an RDP-fashioned relay (e.g. sort of a terminal services derivative/hybrid-codec).</p><p></p><p>I originally wash pushing uPnP quite a bit, which I believe is now underway. If this were developed a bit, you’d have a pretty clean client-server media server setup which would address most of the arcane “extender†issues.</p><p></p><p>My point was regarding simple things that make XBMC nice, that would be even better if integrated in MP. For example, the possibility for directory aggregation, which is absolutely critical for those who are familiar with DVD/video archives (and unlike many paradigm altering feature requests, this is relatively trivial). Of course native .ISO format is one initiative I’ve always said I would be happy to contribute, and something nice with XBMC, although I don’t expect it’s on any development list for MP.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rusten, post: 58021, member: 10303"] Right, certainly an "extender" is one such feature worth consideration; however, this is a sensitive word in the context of DVR's because MS has coined it as an RDP-fashioned relay (e.g. sort of a terminal services derivative/hybrid-codec). I originally wash pushing uPnP quite a bit, which I believe is now underway. If this were developed a bit, you’d have a pretty clean client-server media server setup which would address most of the arcane “extender†issues. My point was regarding simple things that make XBMC nice, that would be even better if integrated in MP. For example, the possibility for directory aggregation, which is absolutely critical for those who are familiar with DVD/video archives (and unlike many paradigm altering feature requests, this is relatively trivial). Of course native .ISO format is one initiative I’ve always said I would be happy to contribute, and something nice with XBMC, although I don’t expect it’s on any development list for MP. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
XBMC comparison
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom