XP or Vista for dedicated MP PC (1 Viewer)

markrb

Portal Pro
April 22, 2006
128
2
I have a C2D 6300 @ 2.80Ghz, 1gb ram, 500mb HD, will be getting an 8600GT HDCP card tomorrow, USB-UIRT and SPDIF out for a PC.

I can install XP 32 or Vista 32 Ultimate.

Is there any compelling reason to choose one over the other for MP?

I am leaning towards Vista because the 8600 has better HD-DVD/Blu-Ray Support in Vista.

At this time I do not use the TV server or even have a tuner card. That could change, but not for awhile yet.

Thanks,
Mark
 

Paranoid Delusion

Moderation Manager
  • Premium Supporter
  • June 13, 2005
    13,062
    2,978
    Cheshire
    Home Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Is there any compelling reason to choose one over the other for MP

    None that i have seen, had XP Pro installed previously and MP works fine with both, most probably agree about better support for HD formats with vista, but if you only really want this for a HTPC and you already have xp, cannot see any justification for upgrading, besides a prettier interface which you would not see anyway.
     

    dekkers

    Portal Pro
    December 2, 2006
    99
    0
    42
    Maasdijk
    Home Country
    Netherlands Netherlands
    Well, I think you have to choose it yourself, or try it both on a dual boot config and see wich is running the best.

    I'll go for XP, becouse of the lower resource usage.
    You don't see anyting of Vista when MP is running fullscreen....

    Greetz,

    Dekkers
     

    markrb

    Portal Pro
    April 22, 2006
    128
    2
    Hey PD thanks. This will get your counter up.

    I guess it comes down to how much the HD support in Vista really adds.
    I do watch HD-DVD and will be getting a Blu-RAY drive in the near future.

    Is there really that much of a performance hit using Vista vs. XP?

    Mark
     

    Paranoid Delusion

    Moderation Manager
  • Premium Supporter
  • June 13, 2005
    13,062
    2,978
    Cheshire
    Home Country
    United Kingdom United Kingdom
    Is there really that much of a performance hit using Vista vs. XP

    None that i have noticed, just buggy drivers but even they are improving pretty quickly.

    I'll go for XP, becouse of the lower resource usage

    Possibly, but more importantly is the overall support that XP has from hardware and software manufacturers, which is not likely to be dropped in the near future, in favour of Vista.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Top Bottom