home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
XVID Compression Problem with SVN Build: 06-08-2006 / 20:01
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="htpcoz" data-source="post: 65229" data-attributes="member: 13987"><p>Sorry I didn't make it clear in my previous post, yes you need this version of the elecard codec PLUS MP needs to be changed to reference the correct ClassID.</p><p></p><p>The question with merging this codes is should the modification be based on this older (but not oldest) version of the elecard codec, or the new version (I couldn't get the latest version working with the same modification that worked with the older versions so something else is wrong).</p><p></p><p>The other problem is, if the modification is applied to the main tree anyone using the old version of the codec will break. Another option might be to use the friendly name instead of the moniker (haven't tried that one yet, as I'm back on the road).</p><p></p><p>Who is the developer looking after the transcoder portion of the core ?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="htpcoz, post: 65229, member: 13987"] Sorry I didn't make it clear in my previous post, yes you need this version of the elecard codec PLUS MP needs to be changed to reference the correct ClassID. The question with merging this codes is should the modification be based on this older (but not oldest) version of the elecard codec, or the new version (I couldn't get the latest version working with the same modification that worked with the older versions so something else is wrong). The other problem is, if the modification is applied to the main tree anyone using the old version of the codec will break. Another option might be to use the friendly name instead of the moniker (haven't tried that one yet, as I'm back on the road). Who is the developer looking after the transcoder portion of the core ? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
General Support
XVID Compression Problem with SVN Build: 06-08-2006 / 20:01
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom