Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="tourettes" data-source="post: 298970" data-attributes="member: 10858">If the material is 25 fps progressive then the correct display rate is 25 fps frames. Most likely VRM9 is just reporting the doubled frames that its going to display (just like EVR is doing, but reporting only differently). The results should be the same with EVR & VMR9, both are as smooth as its not possible/feasible to generate missing frames from the 25 -> 50 pull up (well in theory it is, but lets not get into that...) Now if the material is interlaced the fps should be 50, as the material actually consist 50fps, with half information per every odd and even frames. Many software (maybe even all?) software codecs are blending these interlaced frames together and will show the decoded results as 25fps.</blockquote>