Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1128993" data-attributes="member: 82144">Thanks for jumping in. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Mmm, the way I read the first post it was 16:9 content squashed/stretched into a 4:3 frame (ie. the content fills the 4:3 frame to make the most of the resolution; no black bars). To correct the aspect ratio for display, the picture would need to be stretched horizontally (and maybe squashed vertically). In the past I had access to a few channels that broadcast like that. This is the same situation that I had thought WSS was used to handle with analog broadcasts, where the frame size is fixed 4:3 but broadcasters wanted to broadcast 16:9 content.</blockquote>