Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Rick164" data-source="post: 1108918" data-attributes="member: 17766">Think that might cause some issues, next version will have the .exe launching built-in so no worries.True and thanks for finding the error, will add error handling on that one <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Nice <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> , any issues with delays between the different lights?Because when I did some testing it looked like if you entered a too low transition time (&lt; 250ms) the bridge would skip some &quot;check&quot; that kept them in sync and give the good old disco effect.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Rick164, post: 1108918, member: 17766"] Think that might cause some issues, next version will have the .exe launching built-in so no worries. True and thanks for finding the error, will add error handling on that one :) Nice :D , any issues with delays between the different lights? Because when I did some testing it looked like if you entered a too low transition time (< 250ms) the bridge would skip some "check" that kept them in sync and give the good old disco effect. [/QUOTE]

Verification