[fixed] Browse media : can't display more than 500 items (1 Viewer)

Smeulf

Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • October 27, 2010
    672
    454
    France
    Home Country
    France France
    As I said before, there is a small problem in this new function : it can't display more than 500 items, as all views in MP2.

    But in this particular case, it can makes the function unusable. Please see attached picture.

    Cheers.
     

    Attachments

    • media browsing.jpg
      media browsing.jpg
      112.1 KB

    Albert

    MP2 Developer
  • Premium Supporter
  • February 18, 2008
    1,297
    1,130
    47
    Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany
    Home Country
    Germany Germany
    AW: Browse media : can't display more than 500 items

    Yes, I know. I want to add a clustering for the items. Also in the playlist view, which gets unusable if you have multiple thousand items in the PL.
    But I think nevertheless, the maximum number of displayed items should be configurable. And the text "please add more filters" doesn't make sense in this screen.
     

    Smeulf

    Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • October 27, 2010
    672
    454
    France
    Home Country
    France France
    Re: AW: Browse media : can't display more than 500 items

    Yes, I know. I want to add a clustering for the items. Also in the playlist view, which gets unusable if you have multiple thousand items in the PL.
    But I think nevertheless, the maximum number of displayed items should be configurable. And the text "please add more filters" doesn't make sense in this screen.

    Hi,

    As you updated the number of items to 5000, now it works here, but I detected you may have a wrong calculation of the number of items, only for this screen : I think you count the total number of items (ie songs/videos/pictures) in all subfolders.

    Why ? Because my share contains about 300 folders, so under 500 folders/items.

    [Edit] Do please as if I had said nothing, I looked more in the code and seems it won't produce that "problem" anymore. So fixed :) [/Edit]

    Cheers.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Top Bottom