Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1116280" data-attributes="member: 82144">Okay, so this probably explains why the channel lists don't match.The situation is exactly what I already said: if/when a tuning adaptor has to be used, the channel lists may not match....or do you mean you want the nitty gritty technical explanation of why the lists may not match?Ummm. Okay, I'm not surprised about the result... but to me scanning without the resolver seems a very unusual thing to do.With this configuration I'd expect them to get the 333 channels MP finds.I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about here. I guess it must be something specific to NextPVR. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" />Thanks. Please don't forget to mention specific examples of missing channels too, as previously requested.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1116280, member: 82144"] Okay, so this probably explains why the channel lists don't match. The situation is exactly what I already said: if/when a tuning adaptor has to be used, the channel lists may not match. ...or do you mean you want the nitty gritty technical explanation of [I]why [/I]the lists may not match? Ummm. Okay, I'm not surprised about the result... but to me scanning without the resolver seems a very unusual thing to do. With this configuration I'd expect them to get the 333 channels MP finds. I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about here. I guess it must be something specific to NextPVR. :S Thanks. Please don't forget to mention specific examples of missing channels too, as previously requested. [/QUOTE]

Verification