Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="zicoz" data-source="post: 1017518" data-attributes="member: 24585">Not $35, but there is a Netgear one for $60 that aparenlty works With the Surface Pro. And I'm guessing we'll see cheaper ones as time goes by.&nbsp;<a href="http://withinwindows.com/within-windows/2013/6/30/windows-81-features-miracast-wireless-display-tech-and-it-works-well" target="_blank">http://withinwindows.com/within-windows/2013/6/30/windows-81-features-miracast-wireless-display-tech-and-it-works-well</a>&nbsp;That doesn't support the TV Engine, which is #1 reason to use MP for me.</blockquote>That's true, I guess my argument is void since I'm using a dedicated TV server and could just put the client on that.&nbsp;&nbsp;Yeah, I guess that's the problem with open standards instead of proprietary stuff like AirPlay, getting it to work as intended isn't as easy, hopefully with it built into Windows and support from the major OEMs you mention it'll get better over time.&nbsp;&nbsp;But since this is a thread about Chromecast I'll stop my little hijack at this point.[/QUOTE]

[QUOTE="zicoz, post: 1017518, member: 24585"] Not $35, but there is a Netgear one for $60 that aparenlty works With the Surface Pro. And I'm guessing we'll see cheaper ones as time goes by. [url]http://withinwindows.com/within-windows/2013/6/30/windows-81-features-miracast-wireless-display-tech-and-it-works-well[/url] That doesn't support the TV Engine, which is #1 reason to use MP for me.[/quote] That's true, I guess my argument is void since I'm using a dedicated TV server and could just put the client on that. Yeah, I guess that's the problem with open standards instead of proprietary stuff like AirPlay, getting it to work as intended isn't as easy, hopefully with it built into Windows and support from the major OEMs you mention it'll get better over time. [B]But since this is a thread about Chromecast I'll stop my little hijack at this point.[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification