Reply to thread

Message

Sorry for the slow response - it's been a really long day.

Yes, this is expected. MP uses a legacy interface for DiSEqC support with DD tuners. This fact is not relevant for you because you use Unicable, and therefore the DD software and driver are handling all the DiSEqC stuff.

This shows that the different network providers are have different default values. Again, this is not relevant for you because you use Unicable.

Settings for one tuner do not affect behaviour of other tuners, so I can guarantee this change would not have been the key.

This could be it.
Could you please try to switch back to the generic network provider and confirm that tuning/scanning still works.
After that, please try to switch back to stop graph and confirm that tuning/scanning stops working.

Again, I can guarantee that this wouldn't have been the key.

This should work now as long as you're specifying the transponder parameters correctly. If you can give an example, I should be able to point out any mistakes.

This is expected. The modulation values in the transponder list generated by that function are incompatible with the MAX S8.

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1198015" data-attributes="member: 82144">Sorry for the slow response - it's been a really long day.Yes, this is expected. MP uses a legacy interface for DiSEqC support with DD tuners. This fact is not relevant for you because you use Unicable, and therefore the DD software and driver are handling all the DiSEqC stuff.This shows that the different network providers are have different default values. Again, this is not relevant for you because you use Unicable.Settings for one tuner do not affect behaviour of other tuners, so I can guarantee this change would not have been the key.This could be it.Could you please try to switch back to the generic network provider and confirm that tuning/scanning still works.After that, please try to switch back to stop graph and confirm that tuning/scanning stops working.Again, I can guarantee that this wouldn't have been the key.This should work now as long as you're specifying the transponder parameters correctly. If you can give an example, I should be able to point out any mistakes.This is expected. The modulation values in the transponder list generated by that function are incompatible with the MAX S8.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1198015, member: 82144"] Sorry for the slow response - it's been a really long day. Yes, this is expected. MP uses a legacy interface for DiSEqC support with DD tuners. This fact is not relevant for you because you use Unicable, and therefore the DD software and driver are handling all the DiSEqC stuff. This shows that the different network providers are have different default values. Again, this is not relevant for you because you use Unicable. Settings for one tuner do not affect behaviour of other tuners, so I can guarantee this change would not have been the key. This could be it. Could you please try to switch back to the generic network provider and confirm that tuning/scanning still works. After that, please try to switch back to stop graph and confirm that tuning/scanning stops working. Again, I can guarantee that this wouldn't have been the key. This should work now as long as you're specifying the transponder parameters correctly. If you can give an example, I should be able to point out any mistakes. This is expected. The modulation values in the transponder list generated by that function are incompatible with the MAX S8. [/QUOTE]