Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="akayani" data-source="post: 1191135" data-attributes="member: 154126">I accept that this is what happens. That the schedule is the schedule regardless of if the program exists.But consider it from a user perspective. 1. A program is recorded which the user had no interest in. 2. The user clicks the schedule and requests it is not recorded.3. The user attempts to record or watch a program and nothing happens. There is no warning message that I have seen when all the tuners are occupied.4. You look in the schedule and the name of the program doesn't exist.Now I'm not an idiot and have been using computers since punch tape yet I needed to come here to ask about this.I'm on your side here... I'd love to see this program win hands down and have a market share of 1 billion users. What I see were that the case is a heap of support requests because the interface is lacking. The issues I see are all coming from the default 'skin'. This belongs with those issues IMO.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="akayani, post: 1191135, member: 154126"] I accept that this is what happens. That the schedule is the schedule regardless of if the program exists. But consider it from a user perspective. 1. A program is recorded which the user had no interest in. 2. The user clicks the schedule and requests it is not recorded. 3. The user attempts to record or watch a program and nothing happens. There is no warning message that I have seen when all the tuners are occupied. 4. You look in the schedule and the name of the program doesn't exist. Now I'm not an idiot and have been using computers since punch tape yet I needed to come here to ask about this. I'm on your side here... I'd love to see this program win hands down and have a market share of 1 billion users. What I see were that the case is a heap of support requests because the interface is lacking. The issues I see are all coming from the default 'skin'. This belongs with those issues IMO. [/QUOTE]

Verification