home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Watch / Listen Media
Listen Music
Feedback on 1.2 music changes
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="druid9" data-source="post: 750003" data-attributes="member: 28347"><p><strong>Re: AW: Feedack on 1.2 music changes</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the bigger question for Jameson, although he is trying valiantly to meet the need, is why do folks prefer shares view.</p><p></p><p>Once files are properly tagged, the myriad of database views is the only way to fly IMHO. If there is something about shares view that makes it better, I am sure that something could be replicated in a database view, or is it just that nobody likes to tag their files?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="druid9, post: 750003, member: 28347"] [b]Re: AW: Feedack on 1.2 music changes[/b] I think the bigger question for Jameson, although he is trying valiantly to meet the need, is why do folks prefer shares view. Once files are properly tagged, the myriad of database views is the only way to fly IMHO. If there is something about shares view that makes it better, I am sure that something could be replicated in a database view, or is it just that nobody likes to tag their files? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
Support
Watch / Listen Media
Listen Music
Feedback on 1.2 music changes
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom
