FFDshow vs. coreAVC (render quality) (1 Viewer)

[miroslav22]

there is also the free divx h264 directshow filter

ive found the best quality for HDTV (1080 interlaced) comes from the built in Microsoft windows 7 decoder or the free divx one. (mainly due to their de-interlacing). The divx codec is quite CPU intensive, the microsoft one is not.

for progressive content, ive found the quality to be fairly similar for all codecs. (cyberlink codecs marginally best, coreavc marginally worst), although I havent really tried ffdshow or a couple of the others

 

[nexus1313]

AW: FFDshow vs. coreAVC (render quality)

Thx Kiwi for your Link
Ich have searched with "german site" option wtf:
I guess this is also the reason why coreAVC is so fast.

But who have testet all codecs for 1080 content and have a favorite?