- June 13, 2006
- 979
- 178
- Home Country
-
Belgium
- Thread starter
- #221
I don't know how many classes, interfaces or how your API looks like. I can see a lot of integration points all over the place from the TVEngine and the scheduler.
There are no classes, there is only a service API, and I posted that a few days ago together with the source to my TVE3 plugin. Well, actually, there are entity classes (data containers) and I did not post these. I could post those as well to help complete the picture.
Don't get me wrong, I known your features are good, I respect and understand your architecture proposal, but it's something we can't change that easily, especially during a freeze and not knowing how much change we actually need. Without that, we don't know how much we can break in TVE3 for example.
As of now, TVE3Server structure is defined and new code should obey to it. Can it be improved? Probably, but it's how it is for V1. We are focusing on having it stable and reliable. You are more than welcome to help on it.![]()
People keep coming back to this feature freeze. And I keep repeating myself in saying I fully understand that
I'm talking about a possible integration for after the freeze. It's not clear to me if there is the least bit of interest in following a sound architecture for MediaPortal/TVE3. People seem to be far more interesting in features, features, features, and a lot less in a stable product.