home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
initial support for Hauppuage HD-PVR
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue Energy" data-source="post: 695499" data-attributes="member: 109162"><p>Ah - yes, I see. You have a relatively very fast processor and very very fast disk. I checked out s couple of the other systems links as well. As it turns out, though, it isn't helpful to know only the manufacturer of the disk for this. We need to know the model as well. I plan to attempt to look-up the relative specs of each drive used for recording HD and see whether a pattern develops between the go and no-gos.</p><p></p><p>As for processors, it would be helpful if you listed the entire name of your processor. For instance, Wile E. lists using an "Intel Core 2 Quad 2.66". But - there are several of those and they don't all have the same capability. Still - of the three systems I currently know at least something about... presuming that Wile E. is using the least powerful processor that meets the above description, there is possibly the beginning of an interesting trend:</p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'">USER EXPERIENCE PROCESSOR RELATIVE PROCESSOR POWER</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'">------------- ------------------ -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'">mdg78 Positive Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz 3,809</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'">Wile E. Positive Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 3,665</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'">sjeffrey Not Positive Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz 2,244</span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Courier New'"></span></p><p></p><p>Obviously, it's too small a sample size to know much from this. But, with more data - we could fill in the blanks. By the way, I'm using this site for the relative processor power comparisons: </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html" target="_blank">PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks - High End</a></p><p></p><p>Oh, yeah. HTML and spaces. My chart looks pretty bad. Hopefully you can read it anyway. I wonder if there's some way to do charts in this (very nice) forum system?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue Energy, post: 695499, member: 109162"] Ah - yes, I see. You have a relatively very fast processor and very very fast disk. I checked out s couple of the other systems links as well. As it turns out, though, it isn't helpful to know only the manufacturer of the disk for this. We need to know the model as well. I plan to attempt to look-up the relative specs of each drive used for recording HD and see whether a pattern develops between the go and no-gos. As for processors, it would be helpful if you listed the entire name of your processor. For instance, Wile E. lists using an "Intel Core 2 Quad 2.66". But - there are several of those and they don't all have the same capability. Still - of the three systems I currently know at least something about... presuming that Wile E. is using the least powerful processor that meets the above description, there is possibly the beginning of an interesting trend: [FONT="Courier New"] USER EXPERIENCE PROCESSOR RELATIVE PROCESSOR POWER ------------- ------------------ -------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ mdg78 Positive Intel Core2 Quad Q9400 @ 2.66GHz 3,809 Wile E. Positive Intel Core2 Quad Q8400 @ 2.66GHz 3,665 sjeffrey Not Positive Intel Core2 Duo E8400 @ 3.00GHz 2,244 [/FONT] Obviously, it's too small a sample size to know much from this. But, with more data - we could fill in the blanks. By the way, I'm using this site for the relative processor power comparisons: [url=http://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html]PassMark Intel vs AMD CPU Benchmarks - High End[/url] Oh, yeah. HTML and spaces. My chart looks pretty bad. Hopefully you can read it anyway. I wonder if there's some way to do charts in this (very nice) forum system? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
initial support for Hauppuage HD-PVR
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom