home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Popular Plugins
Graveyard
I.F.C. - Intelligent Frame Correction
Intelligent Frame Correction 2.0 *BEAST UNLEASHED*
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kszabo" data-source="post: 618274" data-attributes="member: 61646"><p>I tested IFC now for 2 days on MP 1.1 and went back to ViewModeSwitcher (VMS). </p><p></p><p>This was kind of a decision based on my taste only. I prefer the logics of VMS. I don`t see the necessity of cropping anything of the picture. Switching the view mode alone does what I need. I had the feeling that VMS kicks in faster any is more steady (no streching in-and-out every few seconds as with IFC). I have the feeling that IFC is a technical overkill for a quite simple task as summarized here:</p><p></p><p>I have a 16:9 TV.</p><p>16:9 with 16:9 content -> should be left untouched -> VMS does it</p><p>16:9 with 21:9 content -> ideally should be "vertical smart streched", no plugin can that -> should be left untouched -> VMS does that</p><p>4:3 with 16:9 content letterboxed -> should be simply zoomed in -> VMS does that</p><p>4:3 with 4:3 content -> should be horizontal smart streched -> VMS does that</p><p>I have never seen 16:9 with 4:3 content -> no need for algorhythm</p><p>16:9 HDTV -> should be left untouched, not even scanned -> VMS does that</p><p></p><p>what I would use: vertical smart stretch, which is not supported by MP (only horizontal). But this is not a plugng problem but one of MP.</p><p>I mean: 21:9 content in 16:9 -> slight zoom-in (ca. 5 %), rest of black bars should be eliminated by streching the upper and lower parts of the picture, leaving the middle without distorsion.</p><p></p><p>Thanks anyway, good plugin!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kszabo, post: 618274, member: 61646"] I tested IFC now for 2 days on MP 1.1 and went back to ViewModeSwitcher (VMS). This was kind of a decision based on my taste only. I prefer the logics of VMS. I don`t see the necessity of cropping anything of the picture. Switching the view mode alone does what I need. I had the feeling that VMS kicks in faster any is more steady (no streching in-and-out every few seconds as with IFC). I have the feeling that IFC is a technical overkill for a quite simple task as summarized here: I have a 16:9 TV. 16:9 with 16:9 content -> should be left untouched -> VMS does it 16:9 with 21:9 content -> ideally should be "vertical smart streched", no plugin can that -> should be left untouched -> VMS does that 4:3 with 16:9 content letterboxed -> should be simply zoomed in -> VMS does that 4:3 with 4:3 content -> should be horizontal smart streched -> VMS does that I have never seen 16:9 with 4:3 content -> no need for algorhythm 16:9 HDTV -> should be left untouched, not even scanned -> VMS does that what I would use: vertical smart stretch, which is not supported by MP (only horizontal). But this is not a plugng problem but one of MP. I mean: 21:9 content in 16:9 -> slight zoom-in (ca. 5 %), rest of black bars should be eliminated by streching the upper and lower parts of the picture, leaving the middle without distorsion. Thanks anyway, good plugin! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Plugins
Popular Plugins
Graveyard
I.F.C. - Intelligent Frame Correction
Intelligent Frame Correction 2.0 *BEAST UNLEASHED*
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom