Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stepko" data-source="post: 731113" data-attributes="member: 57342">AW: IPTV/DVB-IP in MP: Support for http, rtp and udpHi georgius,just wanna post the results of the test I did with your version. It did a very good job!!!The test: I recorded one channel and then started live TV on another channel. So there were 2 channels running at the same time! I zapped around a bit and then let both channels run for 2 hour. Counting both channels the filter recorded 4 hours.Result: All in all there were only 2 frame drops. The second was only because I started a big download on the same connection <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I think this version works very well on rtp streams. The only downside is that it doesn't pass the timestamps to the next filter (there is a rtp timestamp in the rtp header).Will try this version on my htpc for the next days to see how it works in a longer term.Stepko</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stepko, post: 731113, member: 57342"] [b]AW: IPTV/DVB-IP in MP: Support for http, rtp and udp[/b] Hi georgius, just wanna post the results of the test I did with your version. It did a very good job!!! The test: I recorded one channel and then started live TV on another channel. So there were 2 channels running at the same time! I zapped around a bit and then let both channels run for 2 hour. Counting both channels the filter recorded 4 hours. Result: All in all there were only 2 frame drops. The second was only because I started a big download on the same connection :) I think this version works very well on rtp streams. The only downside is that it doesn't pass the timestamps to the next filter (there is a rtp timestamp in the rtp header). Will try this version on my htpc for the next days to see how it works in a longer term. Stepko [/QUOTE]

Verification