Is this really as good as live-tv gets?!? (5 Viewers)

MadDuke

MP Donator
  • Premium Supporter
  • October 9, 2006
    58
    0
    43
    Home Country
    Denmark Denmark
    Hi,
    I’m not really satisfied with my tv picture, and I hope someone can give me some pointers because I’m a bit lost! It’s not that I can’t find any threads concerning better tv pictures – the problems is that there are so many that I’m now completely confused!

    To start out with this is the ‘main’ parts of my HTPC setup:

    HAL9000 – Family Entertainer
    Motherboad: Asus M2N-E
    CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 AM2 4200+ Box 65W
    RAM: 2 x G.Skill DDRII 1GB PC800
    HardDisk: Samsung SpinPoint P80SD SATAII
    Graphicscard: Asus GeForce GF6600 TOP PCI-E 256MB Silencer
    DVB-T: Hauppauge WinTV-NOVA-T
    DVB-S: FloppyDTV-S + 'Dual CA CAM' (/w. Canal Digital 'Family')
    TV/’monitor’: Samsung 32” LCD – connected with VGA cable (1366x768@60hz)
    OS: Windows XP Pro UK /w SP2 (all updates until 04/12/2006)
    "Frontend": Media Portal v. 0.2.1 /w svn from the 26/11/2006
    Video Codec: Nvidia / MPV
    Audio Codec: ffdshow

    My Nivida setting are:
    Hardware Acceleration: ’Yes’
    De-Interlance Controle: Smart
    De-Interlance Mode: VMR default
    Enhanced nView support: Prefer VMR9
    -I have also tweaked the PureVideo control panel so I have access to a lot of other settings, but I haven’t changede anything!

    I have to say that my tv pictures has improved a lot the last few days, as I have made a lot of updates/tweaks etc. from information found in various fora, eg. in the threads:
    “Attention!! these microsoft patches fix many things!!!”
    and
    “Registry settings for Nvidia decoders”.
    But I’m still not super-satisfied with the result.

    I ‘try’ to use Nvidia PureVideo codec for video, as I have been told that it is by far the best, but MPV codec actually seems superior in real use!?! And when it comes audio, the one DVB-T channel I watch (Danish TV2) doesn’t work with Nvidia so here I use ffdshow (I can’t make MPA work with Animal Planet – and that’s a must for my girlfriend!)

    The main problems I encounter are:

    Primary:

    ’Pixel-bars’
    Ever so often there will be drawn a bar/line of ‘bad pixels’ across the screen, just for a fraction of a second but still totally unacceptable.

    ‘Frame-stutters’
    Even worse is it when the picture momentarily freezes and then resumes very shortly afterwards
    (also a fraction of a second) it’s like the HTPC somehow ‘lost’ some frames!

    ‘UnSmooth’
    This has also improved greatly, but there is still a tendency for moving text, like in the bottom-line of CNN, or in movie credits to be ‘unsmooth’ and make ‘micro-stutters’ – this also applies for sports like in a football game!

    'OOS'
    Sometimes my picture is out-of-sync with the sound (or the otherway around!?!)

    Secondary:

    ‘Pixel-effect’
    It happens that the picture is somewhat ‘pixel-like’, eg. I can see ‘pixel-squares’ in waves in the see! – not that often though

    ’Unsharp/blurry’
    The picture is not exactly super-sharp, but has improved greatly the last few day (earlier seemed a bit sharper, but was very ‘interlaced’) – It seems that there is a ‘blur-filter’ activated, and static boxes (e.g. ‘name-boxes’ seen on the news) have a slight vibrating effect (this has also been better earlier!) – But even though it is still a bit blurry/foggy I don’t know if you can expect more from DVB-S/T, I know I can’t expect ‘HD’ quality. But if it can be improved it would be nice.


    The thing that ‘Frame-stutters’ is worse with the ‘Nvidia codec’ than with ‘MPV’ – here I usually get the less irritation (but still intolerable) ‘pixel-bars’ instead - but sometimes it also stutters! It also seems that when I record a show, generally all errors are ‘improvede’ a bit, so the playback looks better than live!

    As I mentioned, I primarily watch satellite-tv, and have tested the signal with 'FastSatfinder' and a Set-Top-Box and both told me that both signal- strength and quality was at 65% - FastSatFinder had a ‘low’ of 64% over a 6 min test. (I have been told that 60% is quite fine!)

    Some has pointed out to me that the problem might be with connected to ‘VMR9’ – and when I try to start tv ‘in the background’ (from the ‘Home-Screen’) MP refuses and gives me an error related to ‘VMR9’

    Another problem could be the up-scaling of the tv-picture to 1366x768 – and also the matter of Hz (but the tv wont run at 50hz)

    I really hope that someone out there has a solution – or at least some thoughts on my problems! (If it is necessary I can make sceendumps and a few videoclips as examples – but as I said, they a generally not showing all the problems in ‘live tv’)

    /MadDuke
     

    rtv

    Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • April 7, 2005
    3,622
    301
    Osnabruck
    Home Country
    Germany Germany
    Don't believe the people telling you Nvidia codecs are the best - even if they are team mates :p

    In fact I get different results on 4 PCs with 6600GT, 6250, X1300 and XPress200 but MPV looks always better than Nvidia here. On some machines the Cyberlink7 codecs are slightly better but they might be buggy with most modern video formats.

    You should definately try to deactivate "Hardware Acceleration" if you're not watching HDTV - the stutters should be almost gone after that.
     

    knutinh

    Portal Pro
    September 4, 2005
    558
    2
    If you are from Denmark and watch live tv using a 60Hz lcd then you will get bad "micro stuttering" stemming from framerateconversion.

    If the tv is HD-ready then it is supposed to allow 720p@50 and 720p@60. If you cant get this, then you should do some display-setup research. Powerstrip or recent nvidia drivers does this easily.

    Oh, and in my view, scaled content on native framerate looks better than non-scaled content framerateconverted. My tv allows 1:1 pixel at 66Hz or scaled/cropped 50/60Hz at 720p. I clearly prefer the latter. For PAL content you may get even better image if you run the image through the HTPC unscaled to PAL@50, since the tv has to do scaing anyways, and one tv scaling from 576 to 768 may be better than one HTPC scaling from 576 to 720 followed by tv scaling from 720 to 768.

    -k
     

    MadDuke

    MP Donator
  • Premium Supporter
  • October 9, 2006
    58
    0
    43
    Home Country
    Denmark Denmark
    Even though it didn't make any sense to be at all, I tried to deactivate the HW Acceleration - things just got worse! (so it's back on!)

    Even though the Samsung claims to be 'HD-Ready' I have some trouble setting the resolution to 50hz (I use the newest Nvidia drivers), but that is probably just my fault! - I wont put much time in to that solution though, as the tv is borrowed from a mate, who is abroad studying until Christmas. (then it's 'bye bye' flat-screen - and back to a CRT)

    Like the HW Acceleration thing, I have a hard time believing that Nvidias PureVideo isn't the thing to go for (no offence rtv) - can anyone back this up or can you (rtv) elaborate a bit - or is it just one of those 'unexplainable' cases?

    Couldn't there be any other factors? like the VRM9 vs. Overlay (some say MP don't really run in 'full screen' but is still somehow windowed, and therefor can be 'exclusive'. - can ANYONE actually that the live-tv in the background from in the 'home screen' ?

    P.S. Sorry I posted the wrong place!

    /MadDuke - a bit sad that his aprox. €1.400 HTPC doesn't live up to expectations
     

    MadDuke

    MP Donator
  • Premium Supporter
  • October 9, 2006
    58
    0
    43
    Home Country
    Denmark Denmark
    ok maybe I was a bit arrogant! It just hit me, rtv if you say I shouldn't use Nvidia PureVideo, then it can't be in the PureVideo settings you wanted be to disable HW Acceleration - what did you have in mind instead?

    - And does it make sense to any of you to 'force' the DirectDraw to '50' (does that have anything to do with the 'resolution problem')

    /MadDuke - a bit more humble!
     

    tourettes

    Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • January 7, 2005
    17,301
    4,800
    First thing you should be doing is to find a way to use 50Hz in TV, PAL material will always be jerky if it's played with 60Hz. 75Hz would be also ok as it's multiple of 25.

    After that is solved then we should start to look at the remaining issues.
     

    MadDuke

    MP Donator
  • Premium Supporter
  • October 9, 2006
    58
    0
    43
    Home Country
    Denmark Denmark
    Hmm, I tried fiddeling a bit more with the resolution! Even though windows said that the tv did not support 1366x768@75hz I got a picture. It was quite 'rough' though (eg tekst/lines was not at all sharp) - and live tv in MP was way more flikkering than before!

    Does the 'Display Timing Mode' make any difference - at the moment it's set at 'Auto' but I can pic: GTF, DMT, CTV and Fixed Aspect Ratio
    -there is also a checkbox where I can enable some sort of double scan ('where supported')

    /MadDuke
     

    rtv

    Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • April 7, 2005
    3,622
    301
    Osnabruck
    Home Country
    Germany Germany
    Forget that TV - the hardware suggestion forum has a Topic about LCD TV; Samsung's aren't recommendable for PC-usage.
     

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Top Bottom