Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mm1352000" data-source="post: 1135851" data-attributes="member: 82144">That's a good observation. Makes it much more likely that it's a signal quality issue... or perhaps a mistake in the parameters for that transponder.I would disagree. The reading that is logged is just one snapshot in time. Since manual control shows one snapshot every few seconds, it should give a better understanding.Perhaps.Note that the readings won't necessarily show temporal (jittery) issues, because they're averages... and only captured every few seconds.Also, add weather (wind and rain) to the possible causes. As previously mentioned, it doesn't take much more than a centimetre or two of dish movement to compromise signal quality.85% CPU won't necessarily affect TV. It could, but no guarantee. The discontinuities definitely will. In my opinion these are 2 different issues, and the discontinuity one is the more important one to solve (...because it will definitely cause pixellation etc.).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mm1352000, post: 1135851, member: 82144"] That's a good observation. Makes it much more likely that it's a signal quality issue... or perhaps a mistake in the parameters for that transponder. I would disagree. The reading that is logged is [I]just one[/I] snapshot in time. Since manual control shows one snapshot every few seconds, it should give a better understanding. Perhaps. Note that the readings won't necessarily show temporal (jittery) issues, because they're averages... and only captured every few seconds. Also, add weather (wind and rain) to the possible causes. As previously mentioned, it doesn't take much more than a centimetre or two of dish movement to compromise signal quality. 85% CPU won't necessarily affect TV. It could, but no guarantee. The discontinuities [I]definitely [/I]will. In my opinion these are 2 different issues, and the discontinuity one is the more important one to solve (...because it will definitely cause pixellation etc.). [/QUOTE]

Verification