I have been using Sceneo before coming back to MP. I must say that the comments in the initial post about MP are not at all justified. I have never tested Microsoft's Media Center, but with all others that I tested, there are issues. It took me ages to get Sceneo v2 working and when I got their current third version, I was very disappointed because for my setup (HTPC not connected to the internet) Sceneo v3 is unusable. When starting with MP again, there are also "issues" but hey: what is the biggest difference between Sceneo, MS, Cyberlink on one side and MP on the other? Yes: MP is OPEN and FREE.
Taking into account that it is free and that the developers are working on it in their spare time, I feel that the comments in the first thread are not appropriate.
Taking into account that neither Sceneo not any other Media center I know of have started to work out a TV-Server-Client architecture like MP does, I must even say that MP is far advanced. There are still issues, but here you get a new version EVERY day. Bugs are fixed on a daily basis. Look for that ANYWHERE else. You won't find it.
I am very happy to be part of a development which will have the BEST and most flexible MediaCenter at its end.
Axel
Taking into account that it is free and that the developers are working on it in their spare time, I feel that the comments in the first thread are not appropriate.
Taking into account that neither Sceneo not any other Media center I know of have started to work out a TV-Server-Client architecture like MP does, I must even say that MP is far advanced. There are still issues, but here you get a new version EVERY day. Bugs are fixed on a daily basis. Look for that ANYWHERE else. You won't find it.
I am very happy to be part of a development which will have the BEST and most flexible MediaCenter at its end.
Axel