Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="2BitSculptor" data-source="post: 273131" data-attributes="member: 65661">But we are only talking about the display device, not the internal workings of Media Portal. It isn't limiting the forward movement of core function. Only demonstrating the strengths and versatility of the eloquent design of Media Portal as a &quot;do it all&quot; package. Something that is fully evolutionary as technology changes, but still bridging the gap. I think there is only the challenge of breaking the display information down into smaller digestible chunks for those who wish to keep a clean, managed look to the design for small displays, and those with the larger displays can can spread the information out, allowing more area for larger design elements. And should the personal/portable/pocket display devices gain a larger share of the market, then all those design elements and volumes of instant information all shown at once become unusable.... and the skin will again have to adapt to the immediate needs of the user, but still hold its own for those who don't have the luxury and still have the old, oversized, stationary, 16000 X 12000 pixel&nbsp; panel device covering their livingroom wall. Minimum hardware requirements shouldn't demand only one kind of display device. And one size skin doesn't fit all purposes. But I also concede, that not all skin designs translate well in every case.Monochrome is a design 'concept' that would translate well for 4:3.okay... I'm done too, I'm exhausted. :sorry:Chuck</blockquote>

[QUOTE="2BitSculptor, post: 273131, member: 65661"] But we are only talking about the display device, not the internal workings of Media Portal. It isn't limiting the forward movement of core function. Only demonstrating the strengths and versatility of the eloquent design of Media Portal as a "do it all" package. Something that is fully evolutionary as technology changes, but still bridging the gap. I think there is only the challenge of breaking the display information down into smaller digestible chunks for those who wish to keep a clean, managed look to the design for small displays, and those with the larger displays can can spread the information out, allowing more area for larger design elements. And should the personal/portable/pocket display devices gain a larger share of the market, then all those design elements and volumes of instant information all shown at once become unusable.... and the skin will again have to adapt to the immediate needs of the user, but still hold its own for those who don't have the luxury and still have the old, oversized, stationary, 16000 X 12000 pixel panel device covering their livingroom wall. Minimum hardware requirements shouldn't demand only one kind of display device. And one size skin doesn't fit all purposes. But I also concede, that not all skin designs translate well in every case. Monochrome is a design 'concept' that would translate well for 4:3. okay... I'm done too, I'm exhausted. :sorry: Chuck [/QUOTE]

Verification