- December 6, 2007
- 432
- 14
- Home Country
-
Netherlands
See: Multimedia Class Scheduler Service (Windows)Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP/2000: MMCSS is not available.
So it is >= vista
Netherlands
See: Multimedia Class Scheduler Service (Windows)Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP/2000: MMCSS is not available.
See: Multimedia Class Scheduler Service (Windows)Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP/2000: MMCSS is not available.
So it is >= vista
See: Multimedia Class Scheduler Service (Windows)Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP/2000: MMCSS is not available.
So it is >= vista
If you check the patch I bet the code is taking care of that (loading the method from a DLL instead of directly linking against it).
Netherlands
and the sample buffers have been increased from 5 to 10 - plus a few other minor changes. Note - early feedback is showing problems on low-end GPUs at least...
1920x1080x32*10 / 1024 / 8 which is approx 80MB. On top of that MP textures and video decoding memory requirement + AERO. I'm quite sure that the GPU memory usage is causing at least some of the trouble low end GPU users are seeing. It would be better to base the amount of frames to the available / free GPU memory. Some care needs to be taken since it could be that Vista / Windows 7 report the virtual GPU memory as well (that is something we really don't want to use with video playback).
and the sample buffers have been increased from 5 to 10 - plus a few other minor changes. Note - early feedback is showing problems on low-end GPUs at least...
1920x1080x32*10 / 1024 / 8 which is approx 80MB. On top of that MP textures and video decoding memory requirement + AERO. I'm quite sure that the GPU memory usage is causing at least some of the trouble low end GPU users are seeing. It would be better to base the amount of frames to the available / free GPU memory. Some care needs to be taken since it could be that Vista / Windows 7 report the virtual GPU memory as well (that is something we really don't want to use with video playback).
@ Tourettes, can you estimate how much memory is required on a GPU for the things you mention? Is 512mb enough? Or is this clearly insufficient.?
@ Owlsroost, what is your thouth about the thing I am seeing.... Described >>here<<. FYI, this morning I tried V12. No change on the result...
Thank guys for the focus to improve things even further![]()
Netherlands
Arrghh.. thats not what I wanted to hear..You need a more powerful video card....all the symptoms point to that being the problem....
Tony