Spain
No more crashes here, so forget it about this.I can't say I'm sure v56 is guilty... but yesterday night I got some MP crashes (windows "stop working" message) while watching live-tv (when zapping) that I didn't have before...
@Owlsroost, I was using 1.2.0 dll (v45 if I'm right) till yesterday night... Do you thing v56 could cause this crashes?
I'll do some more in deep testing and post, with new v57 also....
Germany
19-01-2011 19:26:36.027 [4b4]Display (from windows): 1920 x 1080 @ 50.000000 Hz | Measured refresh rate: 49.998636 Hz
V56:
19-01-2011 21:12:58.576 [1378]Display (from windows): 1920 x 1080 @ 50.000000 Hz | Measured refresh rate: 50.002808 Hz
Didn't check source code yet - but I would assume that on your PC the both DLL versions will provide refresh rate information that is between 49.995 and 50.005. Te verify this start playback ten times with both DLL and provide the results.
19-01-2011 21:12:59.110 [93c] Allowed bias values between 0.8999999762 and 1.1000000238
19-01-2011 21:12:59.110 [93c] Adjusting bias to: 1.0000561746
Both was live tv. Isn't this problematic for life tv?
Yes it will be problematic, but most likely the refresh rate is not exact 50 Hz anyway in any PC so there is always a margin of error in the broadcaster and playback rates (this is why TsReader does have small buffer before the live point).
I'm more worried about the newly introduced bias difference for 1:1 matches on audio renderer side. It will cause constantly resampled audio - making the audio quality a bit worse. EVR presenter should have some clamping to keep the almost 1.0 bias rates as 1.0. Anyone have idea what would be an optimal value for this? At least it must be less than the 23.976 vs. 24 difference![]()
What about detecting live tv and then disabling bias > 1?
Is the v56 and v57 possible to apply to ver 1.1.2 ? Or is it only 1.2.0?
Thanks
19-01-2011 19:26:36.027 [4b4]Display (from windows): 1920 x 1080 @ 50.000000 Hz | Measured refresh rate: 49.998636 Hz
V56:
19-01-2011 21:12:58.576 [1378]Display (from windows): 1920 x 1080 @ 50.000000 Hz | Measured refresh rate: 50.002808 Hz
Didn't check source code yet - but I would assume that on your PC the both DLL versions will provide refresh rate information that is between 49.995 and 50.005. Te verify this start playback ten times with both DLL and provide the results.
19-01-2011 21:12:59.110 [93c] Allowed bias values between 0.8999999762 and 1.1000000238
19-01-2011 21:12:59.110 [93c] Adjusting bias to: 1.0000561746
Both was live tv. Isn't this problematic for life tv?
Yes it will be problematic, but most likely the refresh rate is not exact 50 Hz anyway in any PC so there is always a margin of error in the broadcaster and playback rates (this is why TsReader does have small buffer before the live point).
I'm more worried about the newly introduced bias difference for 1:1 matches on audio renderer side. It will cause constantly resampled audio - making the audio quality a bit worse. EVR presenter should have some clamping to keep the almost 1.0 bias rates as 1.0. Anyone have idea what would be an optimal value for this? At least it must be less than the 23.976 vs. 24 difference![]()
Hi there,
I had tried both 56 and 57. Both gave me lip sync issues after a period of time.
I will try and do some more testing this weekend and post logs.
My setup is ATI 5670, onboard sound, single seat, running 1.2.0.
Thanks,
J.
If reporting 'accurate' measured rates to the audio renderer code is causing a problem, I could add back the 'find best match to allowed refresh rates' code - any thoughts ?
(Actually, the new refresh rate estimator is probably accurate enough to differentiate between 23.976Hz and 24.000Hz - a 0.1% difference, so the 'best match' code might work better than it used to).
I'm more worried about the newly introduced bias difference for 1:1 matches on audio renderer side. It will cause constantly resampled audio - making the audio quality a bit worse. EVR presenter should have some clamping to keep the almost 1.0 bias rates as 1.0. Anyone have idea what would be an optimal value for this? At least it must be less than the 23.976 vs. 24 difference