Onboard GPU v Dedicated (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter Strattos
- Start date
- Moderator
- #12
Nope.
- November 21, 2006
- 456
- 18
- Home Country
-
Germany
I own a 4550 512 MB DDR2, perfect for 1080i broadcast....does vector adaptive deinterlacing.
Tried a 5450 1GB DDR3, also perfect for 1080i broadcast and vector adaptive deinterlacing with similar power consumption.
Tried a 5450 1GB DDR3, also perfect for 1080i broadcast and vector adaptive deinterlacing with similar power consumption.
- April 23, 2007
- 755
- 79
- Home Country
-
It's the best way to de-interlace. Superior quality. Usually a setting in your display drivers.
do you know where is this setting in catalyst control ??
guys i need help i buy the 5450 512 ddr3 to upgrade the onboard, i install latest 10.10 ccc but on sd channels i am not happy at all i can see interlace, with hdtv 1080i its all perfct i was trying to find in the ccc the option for the vector adaptive deinterlacing but it doesnt exist,it have only 4 options?then i install the 10.5 ccc from the cd that comes with my card and in this version i can see the vector adaptive deinterlacing.any idea?
I am completely aware that older Intel gpu's are trash but I can't grasp why MP (which I am about to install and try) can't work properly with the Core line integrated gpu's?? I can view/record 1080i/p content fine in Windows 7 MCE and can play high bit rate MKV bluray rips (in XBMC or VLC) perfectly fine with it. I stream uncompressed rips and HD audio and even using software decoding it uses very little cpu usage on a i3 530. Also, the new version of FFMpeg supports the Clarksdale gpu's HW acceleration of H264 using DXVA which drops cpu usage down to nothing. Why would MP be any different?