Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Paranoid Delusion" data-source="post: 396432" data-attributes="member: 13176">Just to throw a spanner in the works here.Most of my files are dxva compliant (2 are not apparently), now if i play a file using PDVD's h.264 codec, I get low cpu use with MP, if I switch to MPC codec, cpu rises, but not by a great deal (12 to 20%), if i play the same file in MPC-HC it runs at 50% <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite5" alt=":confused:" title="Confused&nbsp; &nbsp; :confused:" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":confused:" />,&nbsp;and despite all my settings being set to the correct parameters in MPC config, it always shows no dxva.Think there is a difference between how Nvidia and ATI handle these files, yes I know more modern gpu's are more effective, but it still should not reflect such a difference, unless some major post processing of the file is being done without you knowing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Paranoid Delusion, post: 396432, member: 13176"] Just to throw a spanner in the works here. Most of my files are dxva compliant (2 are not apparently), now if i play a file using PDVD's h.264 codec, I get low cpu use with MP, if I switch to MPC codec, cpu rises, but not by a great deal (12 to 20%), if i play the same file in MPC-HC it runs at 50% :S, and despite all my settings being set to the correct parameters in MPC config, it always shows no dxva. Think there is a difference between how Nvidia and ATI handle these files, yes I know more modern gpu's are more effective, but it still should not reflect such a difference, unless some major post processing of the file is being done without you knowing. [/QUOTE]

Verification