home
products
contribute
download
documentation
forum
Home
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
All posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Donate
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Q: TVE3 = poorer PQ for (HW)analogue card users?
Contact us
RSS
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="misterd" data-source="post: 291965" data-attributes="member: 19503"><p>Many drivers of Hauppauge have implemented the interfaces of M$. The main problem is that the standard methods doesn't tell us the exact maximum bitrate. There are still some other possibilities in those interfaces. But like for the old approach we won't change there something before 1.0. The reason is that this would be a new feature.</p><p></p><p>Perhaps we will add some additional features after 1.0 for both approaches and after the feature-freeze.</p><p></p><p>MisterD</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="misterd, post: 291965, member: 19503"] Many drivers of Hauppauge have implemented the interfaces of M$. The main problem is that the standard methods doesn't tell us the exact maximum bitrate. There are still some other possibilities in those interfaces. But like for the old approach we won't change there something before 1.0. The reason is that this would be a new feature. Perhaps we will add some additional features after 1.0 for both approaches and after the feature-freeze. MisterD [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
MediaPortal 1
MediaPortal 1 Talk
Q: TVE3 = poorer PQ for (HW)analogue card users?
Contact us
RSS
Top
Bottom