Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Kotik" data-source="post: 720073" data-attributes="member: 89825">Re: VC-1 issues (VC1)The last version DOES work <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Gratz<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> and thanx.LAV is a splitter that has constant development and i like it's all in one splitter approach. Plus, nevcairiel (LAV dev) is someone that you can get in touch with.MPC-HC dev team announced that when LAV is stable enough they will replace all the Gabest splitters with LAV. So the way i see it LAV is the way to go today<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> So i am willing to try it and give feedback.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Kotik, post: 720073, member: 89825"] [b]Re: VC-1 issues (VC1)[/b] The last version DOES work :) Gratz:) and thanx. LAV is a splitter that has constant development and i like it's all in one splitter approach. Plus, nevcairiel (LAV dev) is someone that you can get in touch with. MPC-HC dev team announced that when LAV is stable enough they will replace all the Gabest splitters with LAV. So the way i see it LAV is the way to go today:) So i am willing to try it and give feedback. [/QUOTE]

Verification