Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="cold_realms" data-source="post: 154996" data-attributes="member: 48403">unfortunatly that is not only impractical but simply does not work. I did some more testing with all the latest SVN's the results are thus:t:\&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; ---&gt;No files foundt:\3rd rock from the sun&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp; ---&gt;No Files Foundt:\3rd rock from the sun\season 1\&nbsp; &nbsp; ---&gt;Files found!&nbsp;&nbsp; So it will not traverse folders. I believe I have an idea of why. For organization and ease of upgrades (not to mention simple navigation) I use mounted volumes as folders on my server. Windows server 2000 and 2003 r2 sp2 have an annoying habit of listing to other programs the &quot; System Volume Information&quot; folder of each mounted volume but not allowing access to them. Other programs in the past have had issues where the error detection logic would crap out if there was a folder they could not access (a simple fix I am told by all the devs I have run into problems with. I have emailed MS techs and they say it is by design that the folder is listed so there is nothing to do on that end. I am not sure why the old version would be ok with my structure and the new one would not.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="cold_realms, post: 154996, member: 48403"] unfortunatly that is not only impractical but simply does not work. I did some more testing with all the latest SVN's the results are thus: t:\ --->No files found t:\3rd rock from the sun --->No Files Found t:\3rd rock from the sun\season 1\ --->Files found! So it will not traverse folders. I believe I have an idea of why. For organization and ease of upgrades (not to mention simple navigation) I use mounted volumes as folders on my server. Windows server 2000 and 2003 r2 sp2 have an annoying habit of listing to other programs the " System Volume Information" folder of each mounted volume but not allowing access to them. Other programs in the past have had issues where the error detection logic would crap out if there was a folder they could not access (a simple fix I am told by all the devs I have run into problems with. I have emailed MS techs and they say it is by design that the folder is listed so there is nothing to do on that end. I am not sure why the old version would be ok with my structure and the new one would not. [/QUOTE]

Verification