Reply to thread

Message

Ok..In this situation goofy means anything other than the scanned TP.
For instance on 101°W I scan for specific TP using 3974 V 5924 instead of getting that in the preview I get 3957 V 2734.
Strangely enough when I scanned from a freshly updated TP list on 101°W I didn't get either of the TP's mentioned above all I got was the encrypted TP's at 3980 H > I'm not mking this up although I gotta admit it sure sounds like I am

The reason I went through all that was due to that particular machine is a 24X7 computer that also runs a weather program that pushes warnings, forecasts and similar data to my web site. It is constantly parsing data so I though maybe with the addition of MP I might be taxing the performance a tad.. Didn't really look for any changes except for lower CPU usage but I would take a surprise had it happened

No problem there. I will get the logs for you the next time I get a chance to work with it, shouldn't be long ...

I agree with you here the only reason I look at it as a problem is because I can lock them with no problems using the same hardware just different programs

Are you referring to when I do a scan? If so the only LNB activated is the one for the band I am scanning

Amiko Alien 3

Agreed here too. Just because one TP is 8PSK doesn't mean the entire bird is the same

I'm sure it's a simple something I am overlooking. The program is way too good to be it's normal behavior , it has to be on my end somewhere.

Thanks again for taking time to read my lengthy post

<blockquote data-quote="EW Thomas" data-source="post: 1173673" data-attributes="member: 156943">Ok..In this situation goofy means anything other than the scanned TP.For instance on 101°W I scan for specific TP using 3974 V 5924 instead of getting that in the preview I get 3957 V 2734.Strangely enough when I scanned from a freshly updated TP list on 101°W I didn't get either of the TP's mentioned above all I got was the encrypted TP's at 3980 H&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; I'm not mking this up although I gotta admit it sure sounds like I am <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />The reason I went through all that was due to that particular machine is a 24X7 computer that also runs a weather program that pushes warnings, forecasts and similar data to my web site. It is constantly parsing data so I though maybe with the addition of MP I might be taxing the performance&nbsp; a tad.. Didn't really look for any changes except for lower CPU usage but I would take a surprise had it happened <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> No problem there. I will get the logs for you the next time I get a chance to work with it, shouldn't be long ...I agree with you here the only reason I look at it as a problem is because I can lock them with no problems using the same hardware just different programsAre you referring to when I do a scan?&nbsp; If so the only LNB activated is the one for the band I am scanningAmiko Alien 3Agreed here too. Just because one TP is 8PSK doesn't mean the entire bird is the same <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />I'm sure it's a simple something I am overlooking. The program is way too good to be it's normal behavior , it has to be on my end somewhere.Thanks again for taking time to read my lengthy post <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="EW Thomas, post: 1173673, member: 156943"] Ok..In this situation goofy means anything other than the scanned TP. For instance on 101°W I scan for specific TP using 3974 V 5924 instead of getting that in the preview I get 3957 V 2734. Strangely enough when I scanned from a freshly updated TP list on 101°W I didn't get either of the TP's mentioned above all I got was the encrypted TP's at 3980 H > I'm not mking this up although I gotta admit it sure sounds like I am :) The reason I went through all that was due to that particular machine is a 24X7 computer that also runs a weather program that pushes warnings, forecasts and similar data to my web site. It is constantly parsing data so I though maybe with the addition of MP I might be taxing the performance a tad.. Didn't really look for any changes except for lower CPU usage but I would take a surprise had it happened :) No problem there. I will get the logs for you the next time I get a chance to work with it, shouldn't be long ... I agree with you here the only reason I look at it as a problem is because I can lock them with no problems using the same hardware just different programs Are you referring to when I do a scan? If so the only LNB activated is the one for the band I am scanning Amiko Alien 3 Agreed here too. Just because one TP is 8PSK doesn't mean the entire bird is the same :) I'm sure it's a simple something I am overlooking. The program is way too good to be it's normal behavior , it has to be on my end somewhere. Thanks again for taking time to read my lengthy post :) [/QUOTE]