Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Asmo" data-source="post: 83639" data-attributes="member: 11799">The middle is interlacing indeed. The lower looks like a dirty quick way of deinterlacing. I'd say, experiment with the different deinterlacing options (from my head, MPV has a seperate deinterlacing options in its decoding settings) and/or different codecs.The top looks ok since you see both fields at the same time, and since theres no movement (letters) the image is very sharp. However, when theres movement and you get to see both fields you will get the interlaced effect as seen on the second image.Unfortunally, the PC doesnt work with fields, so we have to discard one to get rid of that effect. Naturally, this also means we are loosing image detail. If done too quick and rudimentary, the third image might be a result of that.So experimentation with the different settings, and possibly other (or new) codecs is the only way to go. Better deinterlacing methods might require more CPU so its all very dependant on what system you use.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Asmo, post: 83639, member: 11799"] The middle is interlacing indeed. The lower looks like a dirty quick way of deinterlacing. I'd say, experiment with the different deinterlacing options (from my head, MPV has a seperate deinterlacing options in its decoding settings) and/or different codecs. The top looks ok since you see both fields at the same time, and since theres no movement (letters) the image is very sharp. However, when theres movement and you get to see both fields you will get the interlaced effect as seen on the second image. Unfortunally, the PC doesnt work with fields, so we have to discard one to get rid of that effect. Naturally, this also means we are loosing image detail. If done too quick and rudimentary, the third image might be a result of that. So experimentation with the different settings, and possibly other (or new) codecs is the only way to go. Better deinterlacing methods might require more CPU so its all very dependant on what system you use. [/QUOTE]

Verification