Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="henso" data-source="post: 1152635" data-attributes="member: 119106">[USER=106003]@FreakyJ[/USER] I had some thoughts (again <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />):Should the transcoding library not be changed to service like you did with the FFMpegLib? Then an eventual Web interface could also use it for transcoding?That then raises the question if whether the DLNA MIA's should be renamed to something more generic? This would then also include that the Metadata Extractors would need to be a shared library/service?Just some thoughts <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="henso, post: 1152635, member: 119106"] [USER=106003]@FreakyJ[/USER] I had some thoughts (again ;)): Should the transcoding library not be changed to service like you did with the FFMpegLib? Then an eventual Web interface could also use it for transcoding? That then raises the question if whether the DLNA MIA's should be renamed to something more generic? This would then also include that the Metadata Extractors would need to be a shared library/service? Just some thoughts :) [/QUOTE]

Verification