Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Koen Zomers" data-source="post: 677825" data-attributes="member: 108135">Sounds good Mike! I've had a chat with DieBagger yesterday and we agreed on the need for a new lightweight WCF service. That takes away the need for Cassini stuff or difficult IIS installation guides. I take you're using the HTTP based endpoint for WCF and not a TCP based one? Not the most optimized for speed, but best for inter compatibility for sure. The hosting application is a Windows Service, correct?What we need to try to avoid is that everyone over and over again starts a lot of work with the same idea: &quot;this is going to be THE MP webservice&quot;. Can't imagine someone starting his/her work with the idea &quot;this is going to be crap!&quot; <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> That's why I suggested one to be included with the next official release of MP. But DieBagger pointed out to me there's a lot to it to &quot;just&quot; add such a thing to the official project. Based from what I read here about your WCF implementation Mike, it sounds very promising and it may well be THE mp webservice implementation everybody can use <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />If you need someone to exchange thoughts with or have a critical review of the code, I'll be willing to be the one for that <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> Otherwise I will patiently await your first release.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Koen Zomers, post: 677825, member: 108135"] Sounds good Mike! I've had a chat with DieBagger yesterday and we agreed on the need for a new lightweight WCF service. That takes away the need for Cassini stuff or difficult IIS installation guides. I take you're using the HTTP based endpoint for WCF and not a TCP based one? Not the most optimized for speed, but best for inter compatibility for sure. The hosting application is a Windows Service, correct? What we need to try to avoid is that everyone over and over again starts a lot of work with the same idea: "this is going to be THE MP webservice". Can't imagine someone starting his/her work with the idea "this is going to be crap!" ;) That's why I suggested one to be included with the next official release of MP. But DieBagger pointed out to me there's a lot to it to "just" add such a thing to the official project. Based from what I read here about your WCF implementation Mike, it sounds very promising and it may well be THE mp webservice implementation everybody can use :) If you need someone to exchange thoughts with or have a critical review of the code, I'll be willing to be the one for that :) Otherwise I will patiently await your first release. [/QUOTE]

Verification