Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="James" data-source="post: 164746" data-attributes="member: 12681">I didn't want to offend. I just think it is better to have one really good system, then many less capable ones. Thats not to say the the small grabbers developed all over the place are less capable. Often they may be better then WebEPG, because they are hard coded to support only one or two sites. However, the installation for the users is worst, because they need to download/install a different program/plugin for their needs. However, rather then develop these super customised grabbers, I would like to see the required features added to WebEPG. Of course WebEPG is a project I started, so I am a little bias <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />One of the biggest complaints I see (coming up again and again) is that the EPG system is (too) hard to configure and not as good as MCE. This will not be improved with lots of small specialised programs. I have tried to find developers interested before but without much luck -&gt; <a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/epg_grabber_development-t2991.html?t=2991&amp;highlight=develop" target="_blank">https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/epg_grabber_development-t2991.html?t=2991&amp;highlight=develop</a>Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack your thread.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="James, post: 164746, member: 12681"] I didn't want to offend. I just think it is better to have one really good system, then many less capable ones. Thats not to say the the small grabbers developed all over the place are less capable. Often they may be better then WebEPG, because they are hard coded to support only one or two sites. However, the installation for the users is worst, because they need to download/install a different program/plugin for their needs. However, rather then develop these super customised grabbers, I would like to see the required features added to WebEPG. Of course WebEPG is a project I started, so I am a little bias ;) One of the biggest complaints I see (coming up again and again) is that the EPG system is (too) hard to configure and not as good as MCE. This will not be improved with lots of small specialised programs. I have tried to find developers interested before but without much luck -> [url]https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/epg_grabber_development-t2991.html?t=2991&highlight=develop[/url] Sorry, I didn't mean to hijack your thread. [/QUOTE]

Verification