Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Herr R aus B" data-source="post: 220114" data-attributes="member: 62807">Better call it driver of the second! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> While I was typing this <a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/showpost.php?p=220108&amp;postcount=115" target="_blank">article here </a>you guys were one driver ahead - damn, I am too old for this shit <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> I honestly advise not too make the repeat code thing too complicated - see my previous article <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /> Furthermore I agree with Manfred and jaylemur, that the repeat frequency is a little bit high... maybe you just ignere each other 0x7E - there are sooooooooo many 0x7Es out there anyway... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />Here are my logs for version 010208d - I guess after posting this article I#ll find out that version 010208m is the one up to date... <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin&nbsp; &nbsp; :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Herr R aus B, post: 220114, member: 62807"] Better call it driver of the second! :D While I was typing this [URL="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/showpost.php?p=220108&postcount=115"]article here [/URL]you guys were one driver ahead - damn, I am too old for this shit :D I honestly advise not too make the repeat code thing too complicated - see my previous article :D Furthermore I agree with Manfred and jaylemur, that the repeat frequency is a little bit high... maybe you just ignere each other 0x7E - there are sooooooooo many 0x7Es out there anyway... :D Here are my logs for version 010208d - I guess after posting this article I#ll find out that version 010208m is the one up to date... :D [/QUOTE]

Verification