Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="ColinT" data-source="post: 317353" data-attributes="member: 29886">I am sure you are right. Reception isn't brilliant here, especially in summer where we are pointing through the trees.However the trees are pretty bare now and I am getting perfect picture with no jitter for the first time ever (due in part to a new set of hardware). I have been using MP for 18 months and have used about 20 builds and have never had to re-tune before (though it is possible that tuning was the cause of other instabilities).I think channel preselection strategy combined with the problems/solutions described in<a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/get-support-90/one-mux-only-gives-me-10000-lcn-39647/" target="_blank">https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/get-support-90/one-mux-only-gives-me-10000-lcn-39647/</a> and<a href="https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/1-0-rc3-svn-builds-289/tv-channel-number-zapping-broken-when-channels-deselected-46518/" target="_blank">https://forum.team-mediaportal.com/1-0-rc3-svn-builds-289/tv-channel-number-zapping-broken-when-channels-deselected-46518/</a> are probably the cause/solution to my problem as well. It seems to be affecting us more in the UK for some reason. It would be good that if MP failed to tune properly and therfore defaulted a load of parameters, either it tried again with a longer session or at least gave us a warning to expect problems, so that we can fix at source rather than leave it to us to find a load of secondary effects. It would also mean that people without a problem wouldnt have to have increased tune times.Hope this doesnt sound too negative as I think the product is great, and a special thanks to Ray for identifying the problem so quickly. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite8" alt=":D" title="Big Grin    :D" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":D" />Regards Colin</blockquote>

Verification