Fanart Handler Plugin v4.0.X.000 (3 Viewers)

HTPCSourcer

Retired Team Member
  • Premium Supporter
  • May 16, 2008
    11,418
    2,336
    Home Country
    Germany Germany
    The basic idea is that to-be-displayed-info is pulled from the music tagging data. Nothing to be said against FH displaying background data for artist 1-n of a given track. Notwithstanding I still believe that tracks should be correctly tagged. The issue with automation is that it can't distinguish between what is correct and what is not.
     

    HomeY

    Test Group
  • Team MediaPortal
  • February 23, 2008
    6,475
    4,645
    49
    ::1
    Home Country
    Netherlands Netherlands
    After an evening of testing i just figured out the the generated thumbs quality based on the folder.jpg (which is the SAME image i embedded in my tags) gives way better thumbnails then from embedded art...
    dB scan with thumbs created from tags resulted in 102 MB of thumbs, were the same scan now with thumbs created from folder.jpg results in 192 MB thumbs.
     

    ajs

    Development Group
  • Team MediaPortal
  • February 29, 2008
    16,039
    11,112
    Kyiv
    Home Country
    Ukraine Ukraine
    dB scan with thumbs created from tags resulted in 102 MB of thumbs, were the same scan now with thumbs created from folder.jpg results in 192 MB thumbs.
    Visually, I think the quality is the same, probably in folders for image compression level of 12, and generates a MP such as the level of 10 when extracts from the tag.
     
    Last edited:

    HomeY

    Test Group
  • Team MediaPortal
  • February 23, 2008
    6,475
    4,645
    49
    ::1
    Home Country
    Netherlands Netherlands
    Visually, I think the quality is the same,
    Nope, the thumbnails created from embedded coverart show more 'grain' in the picture. The thumbnails created from folder.jpg look cleaner/sharper for sure, and are bigger in size. I was just wondering why this would happen, but not really a question that is supposed to be in this thread anyways ;)
    Just give it a try with my thumbnail branch and you'll see the difference.
     

    ajs

    Development Group
  • Team MediaPortal
  • February 29, 2008
    16,039
    11,112
    Kyiv
    Home Country
    Ukraine Ukraine
    FanartHandler 4.0.0.151 (Beta)
    * Fix for FanartHandler.xml
    * Optimize selected Fanart music procedure
    * Optimize scrapper[DOUBLEPOST=1420025813][/DOUBLEPOST]
    Nope, the thumbnails created from embedded coverart show more 'grain' in the picture.
    It is quite possible that they were transformed while maintaining the tag, or extract and save to disk. Just MP resize them, under specified in the configurator.

    The thumbnails created from folder.jpg look cleaner/sharper for sure, and are bigger in size.
    Most likely the MP, they are simply copies, although it may change their size, under specified.

    Just give it a try with my thumbnail branch and you'll see the difference.
    There is no time to try.:( I'm still at work,:( and my girls covered with a festive table:whistle:. Champagne chilled:whistle:. Left to get home, cool vodka with horseradish and I can safely celebrate the New Year. :D:coffee:
     

    Attachments

    • FanartHandler-4.0.0.151.mpe1
      11 MB
    • FanartHandler.4.0.0.151.Beta.zip
      306.4 KB
    Last edited:

    ajs

    Development Group
  • Team MediaPortal
  • February 29, 2008
    16,039
    11,112
    Kyiv
    Home Country
    Ukraine Ukraine
    FanartHandler 4.0.0.152 (Beta)
    * Rework determine procedure (support multi artists) for: #fanarthandler.music.artistclearart.selected and #fanarthandler.music.artistbanner.selected

    PS: Happy New Year !!! :D:whistle::coffee:
     

    Attachments

    • FanartHandler.4.0.0.152.Beta.zip
      306.6 KB
    • FanartHandler-4.0.0.152.mpe1
      11 MB

    Users who are viewing this thread

    Top Bottom