Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="natopotato" data-source="post: 303503" data-attributes="member: 81941">Here is a list of 2400 unique CID's that i pulled from my EPG log info..... i posted it a fewAbout 3/4 of my channels now have EPG.... i am running EPG scan again as i think that will fill the holes in the guide... duno. I checked the log and i did not notice alot of IdleEpgGrabber in there still..... One thing i noticed was this:*******************query results******************(33 row(s) affected)(423 row(s) affected)(34 row(s) affected)(136 row(s) affected)(68 row(s) affected)(35 row(s) affected)(267 row(s) affected)(83 row(s) affected)(27 row(s) affected)(31 row(s) affected)(200 row(s) affected)(58 row(s) affected)(492 row(s) affected)(119 row(s) affected)(473 row(s) affected)(479 row(s) affected)(68 row(s) affected)(267 row(s) affected)(34 row(s) affected)(22 row(s) affected)(33 row(s) affected)(24 row(s) affected)(423 row(s) affected)(21 row(s) affected)(34 row(s) affected)(136 row(s) affected)(10 row(s) affected)(68 row(s) affected)(35 row(s) affected)(267 row(s) affected)(27 row(s) affected)(31 row(s) affected)(200 row(s) affected)(200 row(s) affected)(119 row(s) affected)(479 row(s) affected)(20 row(s) affected)(12 row(s) affected)(34 row(s) affected)**********************************************************I did not do the math but it seems that the total rows is WAY more then the channels i have (990)... is this expected? Could this be because i removed the diceqc colum from your original script.... was that required? (if so can you confirm if your "3" is 110 and your "4" is 119?Attached is my stripped down list of CIDS that failed in my epg log, after i removed the duplicates there were about 2400 unique cids(this file is from my EPG info befor your script)</blockquote>

Verification